Self-Efficacy Perception at Birth: A Comparative Study of Adolescent and Adult

Main Article Content

Benay Oguz Gulsen
Selma Sen

Abstract

Background: Adolescent pregnancy can cause serious problems in terms of the mother, baby and social aspects. There are a limited number of studies worldwide examining the self-efficacy level of adolescent pregnant women in labour. This study was conducted for the purpose of determining and comparing the self-efficacy at birth of adolescent pregnant and adult pregnant.

Materials and Methods:The research had a descriptive cross-sectional design. The study sample consisted of a total of 292 pregnant women, 73 pregnant teenagers and 219 adult pregnant women, who enrolled in a state hospital in Turkey. The study data were collected by the researcher using the Pregnancy Presentation Form and the Turkish version of the Short Form of Childbirth of Self-Efficacy Inventory. The aim of the study was to determine and compare the self-efficacy in childbirth of adolescent women and pregnant adults. Considering the definition of self-efficacy in childbirth as "confidence in the woman's ability to deal with birth". And assuming that there are two types of expectations that influence the behavior of childbirth: the expectation on the result and the expectation on the effectiveness. In this way, a very clear analysis was carried out on the concepts treated in the text. What they understood about pregnancy in adolescence and adulthood was also defined, according to the World Health Organization; teenage pregnancy is defined as pregnancy in girls aged 10 to 19 years. The average age of adult pregnant women was 27.17 years. The entire methodology was rigorously detailed, as well as the location of the research and the subjects. This research was approved by a research ethics committee.

Results: The average scores of the Turkish Version of the Childbirth of Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form calculated for adolescent pregnant as 237.84±34.87, and 257.53±30.29 for adult pregnant. The average scores of “Outcome Expectancies” calculated for adolescent pregnant as 132.89±16.41, and 142.59±13.58 for adult pregnant. The average scores of “Efficacy Expectancies” calculated for adolescent pregnant as 104.95±23.44, and 114.94±23.70 for adult pregnant.

Conclusion: Asignificant difference was found between the Childbirth of Self-Efficacy Inventory total and subscale scores of adolescents and adult pregnancies. Being adult, living in a large family, multiparity, and social support increased self-efficacy at birth.

Keywords:
Childbirth, self-efficacy, adolescent, adult, pregnant.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gulsen, B. O., & Sen, S. (2020). Self-Efficacy Perception at Birth: A Comparative Study of Adolescent and Adult. Asian Journal of Research in Nursing and Health, 3(4), 48-55. Retrieved from https://journalajrnh.com/index.php/AJRNH/article/view/30121
Section
Original Research Article

References

WHO/Adolescent Birth Rate. Global health observatory (GHO) Data. Globally, the adolescent birth rate in 2018 Was 44.1 per 1000 Women Aged 15–19 years. Availableonline:http://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/reproductive_health/adolescent_fertility/en/(accessed on 25 March 2019).

Rexhepi M, Besimi F, Rufati N, Alili A, Bajrami S, Ismaili H. Hospital-based study of maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnancy compared to adult women pregnancy. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019; 7(5):760-766.

Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS). 2018 Turkey demographic and health survey (TDHS). ISBN 978-975-491-390-3, 2019, Ankara.

Asare BYA, Baafi D, Dwumfour-Asare B, Adam AR. Factors associated with adolescent pregnancy in the Sunyani Municipality of Ghana. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2019; 10:87-91. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2019.02.001.

Azevedo WF, Diniz MB, Fonseca ES, Azevedo LM. Evangelista CB. Complications in adolescent pregnancy: Systematic review of the literature. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2015;13(4):618–626. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015RW3127.

Najati N, Gojazadeh M. Maternal and neonatal complications in mothers aged under 18 years. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010;4:219–222.

Ip WY, Tang C, Goggins WB. An educational intervention to improve women's ability to cope with childbirth. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009;18:2125-2135. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02720.x

Ip WY, Chung TK, Tang CS. Chinese Version of the childbirth self-efficacy inventory. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;51(6):625–633. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03548.x

Carlsson M, Ziegert K, Nissen E. Psychometric properties of the Swedish childbirth self-efficacy inventory (SWE-CBSEI). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1):1-11. Available:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/1.

Tanglakmankhong K, Perrin NA, Lowe NK. Childbirth self‐efficacy inventory and childbirth attitudes questionnaire: Psychometric properties of Thai language versions. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011;67(1):193-203. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05479.x

Ersoy Y. The Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the self-efficacy scale-short form. Unpublished master's thesis Turkey: Akdeniz University Health Science Institute, 2011, Antalya.

Khaikin R, Marcus Y, Kelishek S, Balik C. The effect of childbirth preparation courses on anxiety and self-efficacy in coping with childbirth. Clinical Nursing Studies. 2016; 4(3):39-46. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/cns.v4n3p39.

Lazoğlu M. Comparison of the self-efficacy perceptions of pregnant women based on degree of the fear of delivery, Unpublished master's thesis Turkey: Atatürk University Health Science Institute, 2014, Erzurum.

Chinwe AJ. Influence of parenting style, locus of control and self-efficacy on teenage pregnancyinMarkurdi.Unpublished master's thesis Nigeria: University Of Nigeria, 2014, Nsukka.

Khorsandi M, Ghofranipour F, Hidarnia A, Faghihzadeh S, Ghobadzadeh M.The effect of precede proceed model combined with the health belief model and the theory of self-efficacy to increase normal delivery among nulliparous women. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;46: 187-194.

Rastegari L, Mohebbi P, Mazlomzadeh S. The effect of childbirth preparation training classes on perceived self-efficacy in delivery of pregnant women. Zums Journal.2013:21(86):105-115.

İsbir GG, İnci F, Önal H, Yıldız PD. The effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms following childbirth: An experimental study. Applied Nursing Research. 2016;32:227-232. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2016.07.013.

Salomonsson B, Berterö C, Alehagen S. Self-Efficacy in pregnant women with severe fear of childbirth. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic& Neonatal Nursing. 2013;42(2):191-202. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12024.

Sánchez-Cunqueiro MJ, Comeche MI, Docampo D. On the relation of self-efficacy and coping with the experience of childbirth. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2018;8(6):48-55. Available:https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v8n6p48

Kanani S, Allahverdipour H. Self-Efficacy of choosing delivery method and labor among pregnant womenin Pars-Abad city. J Educ Community Health. 2014;1(2):39-47.

Schwartz L, Toohill J, CreedyDK, Baird K, Gamble J, Fenwick J. (). Factors associated with childbirth self-efficacy in Australian childbearing women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015;15(1):29.